On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 16:16 -0600, DDPOMail robot wrote: > Dear John Skaller,
> The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) > you maintain in Debian: > > === felix: (you co-maintain this package) > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > to testing for more than 305 days. > A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO. > See: > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Furr is the other (and real!) maintainer and uploader/DD. A bit confused here: how can Felix 1.1.3 have been in testing for 305 days .. ? Since it was only just uploaded .. :) #430234 -- long double upgrade thing. Ouch. Does the status apply to the source package or just binaries for a particular platform? #339061 -- ia64 build broken -- yes we know, it's a bug in Ocaml on ia64 .. still broken with 3.10? #339164 -- yes, this is a real bug for 1.1.1, but the install model changed with 1.1.3, so Felix no longer ships anything directly in /usr/include or /usr/lib. This bug has a 2005 date on it .. why is it still there? #424252 -- felix: FTBFS if built twice in a row Looks like a packaging issue.. #383942 -- felix: newer upstream release Yeah .. 1.1.2 ... old, should be closed now BTW: why doesn't the Felix mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] get mail about the package status? Mike, is that a listed maintainer address? -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
