On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 15:32 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 08:38:32PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > I've just committed an addition to our CDBS class: automatic generation > > of HTML documentation for libraries using ocamldoc. > [...] > > The default I've just committed is that no packages will use ocamldoc > > per default. > > I think the default should be to attempt to run ocamldoc, so that > maintainers will see the error message and either disable it or add > support for it in their packages.
In fact I go much further .. I'd mandate regression/unit tests for the library and force maintainers to disable them if not provided :) And of course, bounce the package if any tests failed. [My package does that, much to Mike Furr's annoyance at the horrendous build times .. but it has found 2 bugs in Ocaml itself so far] -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
