On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:35:31PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > Go ahead. (even if i don't find the CGI solution a good one, at least, > it exists).
Agreed. I see two drawbacks: - Not all our docs are for APIs -- it would be nice to include all the ocaml tool documentation also - I don't run one a local web server on my workstation, which this requires. But it won't break anything, so I won't object strongly. Also, I don't see the need for the verbose names. What's wrong with the current <PACKAGENAME> entry in /usr/share/doc-base? -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
