On 03-09-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I guess that is what I am going to do, and put debian-ocaml-maint as >> maintainer. Any other opinions on that? > > Personally, I would ask for its removal from the archive. I don't like > to have to take over the burden of a package just because it is written > in OCaml whereas noone of use cares about it. I'm fine with Sylvain's > reasoning, but then we should even stop rebuilding it (just binNMU > maybe) as soon as it won't build anymore we drop it. > > The right path for confluence's user would be to file a RFP to package > atom and find an interested Haskell maintainer. (Maybe we can contact > the Debian Haskell maintainers asking them pro-actively to package it?) > > Of course if you are interested in rebuilding it just go ahead :) >
Well, in fact, i also consider directly dropping from archive, BUT: * popcon of 60 is in fact a good score for ocaml package (i check, there is package that are really lower than that) * upload to the archive is quite recent * it seems to continue building with OCaml 3.10.0 I think we should adopt it, in the name of d-o-m and fill a RFH. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
