On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:02:02AM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > I am maintaining this package and i don't see how it depends on > ocaml-native-compilers.
It doesn't indeed, but looking at the "Architecture:" lines of your package I was presuming it had binary packages which needed the availability of ocamlopt on alpha/arm/ia64. If that was the case those binary would need to be removed from unstable. On a second look it doesn't seem it is, can you confirm this? Then, out of curiosity, why you have long "Architecture:" line for ocamlgsl? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
