On 22-01-2008, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:37:01AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: >> > Yes in principle, but why we need a new empty package? Can't we just add >> > the provides to ocaml-base-nox? It won't be possible for any bytecode >> > OCaml program to use bytecode objects without that package, so why >> > looking for a new one? >> I agree with you but we should also think of native dynlinking, which >> shouldn't require ocaml-base... > > Good point, I agree that for that we would need a new empty package > then. >
If we go for it, we should create an empty package ocaml-abi which provide ocaml-abi-X.XX. If we create an empty package with the version number, i think we will go into the NEW queue everytime we upload a new version of OCaml... (maybe i am wrong) Regards, Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
