On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:37:17AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> In an ideal scenario, OCaml would work precisely as it does now for the
> programmer, but store in the finally linked executables and libraries
> only references to objects that will then be loaded dynamically at
> runtime. If that were true, than your analogy with C would stand.
Unless Xavier has changed his mind, this seems unlikely:
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2004/05/775714fbf05c17e0cbf5c365d6671704.en.html
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
