On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:15:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:57:18PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > I am asking myself, if it is not the right time to split CDBS/policy > > stuff into ocaml-support package. > I'm against of doing that during the transition. More generally, I'm > against adding *anything* which can potentially slow down the > transition, and your plan above is in that category as it increases the > number of sourceful upload we need to do. It also adds potential points > of failures (like, as dumb as it might seem, typo in specifying > dependencies). Seconded. It is in principal a good idea to split off a package with debian-ocaml packaging specific stuff, but let's do that after the transition. If memory serves me right ocaml transitions never went as smoothly as we had imagined it in the beginning, and we shouldn't complicate this even further without need. BTW, I would put "debian" somehere in the name of the package, for instance debian-ocaml-support or ocaml-debian-support. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
