Le Sunday 31 May 2009 16:21:58 Mehdi Dogguy, vous avez écrit : > On 0, Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]> wrote: > > If it weren't for the Pkg-ocaml-maint policy that all packages are to > > be debian packages this would be a native package. It is bad enough > > the source is split between 2 git repositories. I'm not going to split > > changelogs as well. > > That's your opinion. I'm waiting for a confirmation from a DD. > I doubt any DD will agree with you (on this particular package).
I agree that upstream changelog and debian changelog are two different things. For our (savonet) modules, we have a seperate changelog for each, and "new upstream release" entries. This is particularly reasonable because you can have several debian packages for a single upstream release. For the same reason we request to remove the debian/ directory from upstream. If you want to propose your code to people outside of debian, I think it is reasonable to split in two changelogs, hence. Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
