Hello, On 15-06-2009, Guillaume Yziquel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello. > > Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >> >> There is at least one existing applications (ocsimore) which dynamically >> loads pgocaml (that was my interest for packaging pgocaml in the first >> place). You should build the cmxs, make two binary packages >> (libpgocaml-ocaml and libpgocaml-ocaml-dev) and put cma/cmxs/META in >> libpgocaml-ocaml, and the rest in -dev package to cope with this >> situation. There is no documentation (besides #500036) for this yet, but >> you can have a look at react or ocaml-text, for example. >> >>> There's also a profiler for pgocaml which is not yet packaged. Should I >>> create another binary package for it? If so, what naming convention >>> should apply for the profiler package? >> >> I would say it depends on how it is used, and its size. This is a >> debugging tool, isn't it? So it could be put in the -dev package. Is it >> 100 times bigger that the library itself? Then, maybe it is worth >> putting it in a separate binary package... I would probably put it in >> -dev first, and wait for someone to give a good reason to put it apart. > > It seems that I have some splitting to do. I found the following > documentation: > > http://wiki.debian.org/PkgSplit > > However, I have no idea what should be amended in order to play nicely > with cdbs. Advice welcome. >
Why don't you take the option of shipping this profiler into the -dev package ? It is not a general purpose tools and -dev package have probably a lot of thing in common with this tool... Regards Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
