On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:24:54PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 14:42 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:45:17PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > I assume that most of the time is spent generating the fake source > > > file (in wanna-build), then feeding that to edos-builddebcheck > > > (perl) which uses add_sources (python) to transform it to a Packages > > > file. The actualy edos-debcheck run is not the bottle neck. This > > > should be easily verifiable by observing "ps -A". > > > > ACK, that's my feeling as well. Even though I've no access to the said > > machines, I seriously doubt edos-debcheck can take 10 minutes or so. > > note that it's run for each architecture, so even one minute would be a > tad too long. > > > > If the edos-debcheck people could provide a version that has the > > > builddebcheck part implemented in ocaml, I'm sure things would be > > > considerably faster. > > > > Sure, but as I discussed it will be yet another ack, because currently > > edos-debcheck has no notion of sources. It can be done > > nevertheless. Still, before going that way, please check whether > > python-apt is installed or not. > > > > The add-sources.py wrapper uses python-debian which only recommends > > python-apt. If the latter is not installed however, Sources parsing > > happens in pure python instead of using libapt-pkg. That can be a > > serious difference in performances ... > > ah, good call. I guess someone with access to that machine should check, > and then ask DSA to install libapt-pkg.
python-apt is installed, if that is what you mean. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
