Hi Neil, I agree that the output format of edos-debcheck needs some more thought. We probably should implement different output formats, at least one that is easily human-readable (with line breaks and indentations, as the current standard output format), and one format that is easily machine parsable. I was wondering whether it really is worth it to generated XML output, the output seems quiet bloated to me (think of debchecking a complete archive which may easily give thousands of non-installable packages, depending on the architecture). Maybe we can find a more concise text format. I'll think about it, and will come back to you when I have a concrete proposal.
Anyway, thanks a lot for your suggestions. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
