Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > No problem, I remember discussing that on IRC, but it is of absolutely > there importance (I can be of course wrong!), the important thing is > fixing it :-) >
I already fixed it in my local copy. I'll push soon. > FWIW, I've just discovered an even more annoying sub-bug of this, namely > that --include must be on column 0, because the regexp looks like > /^--include/. Also in that case, it would be way better to check for a > word boundary instead of for the beginning of the line. > This is documented and was really done on purpose but I really don't remember why :/ Cheers, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
