Hello, On 15-03-2010, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to >> [email protected] and if every team that still faces work > > Dear OCaml-ers, > I believe we should follow-up on this. AFAICT the major changes we > wanted to have in Squeeze are already done, so unless there are > objections I'll followup stating that "we are fine" basically. If others > want to write the mail, I don't mind, just avoid double postings :-) > I am happy with the current state of my OCaml packages.
However, I plan to upgrade some packages: - dh-ocaml, working on rewriting parts of the policy, should release this week, hope to have the right policy/reference manual in squeeze. - bin-prot, new upstream - sexplib310, new upstream - ounit, planned new upstream - ocaml-fileutils, planned new upstream - ocaml-gettext, planned new upstream All these changes are minor and should not be a problem for squeeze. With or without it, we should go. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
