Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 04:14:42, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > Le 28/09/2010 23:50, Romain Beauxis a écrit : > > On minor point, though: are you aware of other binaries in a similar > > situation? The patch to enable non-custom build was not trivial and, had > > I not been upstream as well, I wonder whether an upstream developper > > would want to work on it or a DD be able to create one alone... > > Enabling non-custom build for pure OCaml applications should be trivial. > But indeed, if the application has C stubs of its own (I'm not talking > about dependencies, here), the build system must be patched somehow to > build and use the shared library with C stubs (dll*.so file), which can > be quite intrusive. If this is done, it should probably be done in > coordination with upstream. But I don't expect upstream to do it on its > own... I am under the impression that most people don't care about > non-native architectures.
Well, I think its more that most upstream do not see the advantage of compiling in non-custom mode... What would you tell them ? Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
