On 04-10-2010, Ralf Treinen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> severity 599093 wishlist >> tags 599093 + moreinfo >> thanks >> >> On 10/04/2010 05:41 PM, Ralf Treinen wrote: >> > Package: dh-ocaml Version: 0.9.6 Severity: normal >> > >> > dh_ocaml spits out a list of warnings concerning modules that are in >> > fact defined in the application program itself, which is annoying. >> > Example bibtex2html (which is compiled to bytecode, if that >> > matters): >> > >> >> I don't know what's the purpose of this bug and how you want us to deal >> with it. So, I'm adding appropriate tags and reducing the severity. >> >> Note that those warnings are important to be sure that all external >> modules are resolved. > > They are not external. They are internal to the program. >
When implementing this warning, we don't know how to be sure that we don't miss a dependency. Ralf, do you know how to make the difference between internal/external? Can we trust that every unresolved symbols are externals? Regards, Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
