[Ce message a aussi été publié sur gmane.test.] On 19-10-2010, Sylvain Le Gall <[email protected]> wrote: > Try to cc the bug as well as the mailing list (for the record). > > On 17-10-2010, Sylvain Le Gall <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 16-10-2010, Guillaume Yziquel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Le Sunday 17 Oct 2010 à 00:10:41 (+0200), Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >>>> Le 16/10/2010 23:24, Guillaume Yziquel a écrit : >>>> > Package: ocaml >>>> > Version: 3.12.0-1~38 >>>> > Severity: normal >>>> >>> >>>> > [...] and digging into >>>> > the callbacks.c file, I discovered that OCaml in Debian is not built >>>> > with the LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE macro enabled. >>>> >>>> Why should it be? >>> >>> To me, the question is "why shouldn't it be?". >>> >> >> [...] >> >>>> > It seems to me that the current situation might be a can of worms and >>>> > segfaults, and I'm wondering whether it would not be a good idea to >>>> > build OCaml with LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE enabled. >>>> >>>> Where did you get that from? Is this LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE documented >>>> somewhere? The only usage I see is in byterun/callback.c, and I don't >>>> see why it should matter here (we are just using the standard bytecode >>>> interpreter). >>> >>> Haven't found documentation on LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE anywhere. I'm >>> stumbling on it doing painful gdb debugging. >>> >>> I do not think that the comments in callbacks.c are very enlightening as >>> to the proper usage of LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE. I'm not saying that it >>> should be changed, but I do not see why it should be kept this way. >>> >> >> The effect of this seems to be quite tricky and "maybe" not worth >> using a different set of options than the default OCaml one. Since, >> Debian packaging do nothing to disable this macro and that upstream >> doesn't enable it or even document it, I am not sure it is a good idea >> to change it in Debian. >> >> This doesn't mean that this is not a problem and that it doesn't cause >> segfault. I just think this issue should be dealt with upstream directly >> so that he can integrate in OCaml 3.12.1 a sane default for this option. >> >> Regards, >> Sylvain Le Gall >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] >> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] >> >> > > Regards, > Sylvain Le Gall > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > >
Regards, Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
