On 21/11/2010 22:53, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 20/11/2010 12:05, Ralf Treinen a écrit : >> I suggest that we add to the dom packaging reference that branches >> intended for primary release into a distribution should be named like >> that distribution, that is experimental, squeeze, whatever-backport, >> etc, with the exception that the branch for sid is called master. >> Does that sound reasonable? > > My own practice is to use git-buildpackage's defaults (master, > upstream) for unstable, and prefix them by "experimental/" (e.g. > experimental/master and experimental/upstream) for experimental. For > $codename, I would similarly create $codename/master and > $codename/upstream. I'd like to see this adopted by the team. >
I like that (I was actually thinking about that in my original mail by got them reversed :p thanks for fixing my mind :)). Cheers, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
