On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:15:18PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 15/03/2011 17:58, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > >>I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I > >>submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream. > > > >Patch looks sensible, but I'm curious, I can't find why it was > >rejected upstream. From a Fedora POV we'd much prefer something that > >Xavier was happy with upstream. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=49;bug=256900
Thanks Stéphane. I'm actually with Xavier on this. We'll continue to use a combination of selectively suppressing prelink and fixing the upstream packages still using the -custom option. I think there's only a tiny number that affect Fedora anyway. But go for it in Debian if you want. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
