Julia Lawall wrote: > There is no short term solution for the semantic patch as written. But it > is possible to reorganize the semantic patch in this case to make it work. > The transformation needs to be just on the specific declared variable, and > not on the complete declaration statement: > > @@ > identifier x; > type T; > @@ > > T x > - = x > ;
Neat trick. I just remembered another feature request: would it be difficult for spatch to write a relevant filename and line number with its error messages? (In this example, I made do by repeatedly bisecting the set of files passed on the command line.) Thanks for the quick and thorough response. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110327061220.GB22856@elie
