Jonathan Ludlam <[email protected]> writes:
> Long term, I believe ours should be dropped - I don't think it provides
> anything in any way better than libuuid, and therefore uuidm. It's in at the
> moment because our main code-base depends upon it, and changing it all over
> would be a reasonably large effort. It's one of the reasons we're putting it
> under the xcp/ subdirectory, so as not to conflict with anything existing and
> so that we don't give the impression that it we think it's ready as a library
> for consumption by others. Our main goal is to be able to get the XCP
> toolstack in, and this is a stepping stone on that path.
>
> Jon
That certainly is the right approach.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
