Le 05/06/2012 17:43, Olivier Andrieu a écrit : >>> I've made a new tarball release (0.9.0). >> >> Thanks. What about the first patch? It still applies to 0.9.0... > > AFAICT it's just a workaround for the same issue (typo in the META > file that prevented the > inclusion of the dependency).
I was expecting a reaction from Florent to this mail, but I've just noticed that it was sent to me in private. I am quite puzzled by the fact that both patches were applied in the Mageia package, and Florent came to us with was looked like two independent patches. Florent, could you give more explanations? Why did you need both patches? I am wondering if the other patch (attached) should be applied or not... Cheers, -- Stéphane
From: Stephane Glondu <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:54:47 +0200 Subject: Fix runtime error due to missing sdlvideo Bug-Mageia: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4460 Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667447 --- src/Makefile | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/Makefile b/src/Makefile index e1f77e1..a60d7f4 100644 --- a/src/Makefile +++ b/src/Makefile @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ loader_MODULES = sdlloader mixer_MODULES = sdlmixer ttf_MODULES = sdlttf gfx_MODULES = sdlgfx +video_MODULES = sdlvideo +gfx_C_SRC = common.c TARGETS = sdl.cma $(patsubst %,sdl%.cma,$(PARTS)) TARGETS += libsdlstub.$(A) $(patsubst %,libsdl%stub.$(A),$(PARTS)) @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ sdlgfx.cma : $(call ML_OBJS,gfx) $(call MKCMA,sdlgfx,sdlgfxstub,$^,$(call SYSLIB,SDL_gfx)) sdlgfx.cmxa : $(call ML_OPT_OBJS,gfx) $(call MKCMXA,sdlgfx,sdlgfxstub,$^,$(call SYSLIB,SDL_gfx)) -libsdlgfxstub.$(A) dllsdlgfxstub.so : $(call STUB_OBJS,gfx) +libsdlgfxstub.$(A) dllsdlgfxstub.so : $(call STUB_OBJS,gfx) $(call STUB_OBJS,video) $(call MKCLIB,sdlgfx,sdlgfxstub,$^,$(call SYSLIB,SDL_gfx)) --
