Hi Stéphane, Thanks for taking the time to look at the report.
> I am sorry, but it is not a bug if jocamlrun segfaults when you feed it > garbage! I believe programs should report an error instead of crashing when they receive garbage. When this is not done, segfaults can potentially be used by hackers to gain control. > And by the way, ocamlrun (from ocaml-base-nox) suffers from the same > issue. Just replace "jocamlrun" by "ocamlrun" in crash.sh and you'll get > the same behaviour. Do you know why it has not been spotted by Mayhem? We do not claim that Mayhem will find all bugs in a program. It might have missed it. I do however remember seeing an integer overflow in ocamlrun that was not reported yet. I can look in more details if you want, but you might not consider that a bug either. > You should add a "NOT A BUG" choice in the "Update status"; none of the > proposed choices seems to fit. We have a "do not report" option. Even though I think it should be reported, we won't report any bugs against maintainers wishes. > You already disclosed it publicly ;-) Indeed, > [email protected] is a public mailing-list. Yeah, I realized that public mailing list are often listed as maintainers a bit too late. > I am curious to see the crash you have found in Coq, though. The report was not sent yet, as we have some issues with special characters in maintainers name. We're hoping to fix that soon and you should get the report by email. Thanks Alexandre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caf1as2j0dxobajrcz4naao3sts0ovq40chpdvwzo6acknv9...@mail.gmail.com

