Le 06/03/2014 15:50, Johannes Schauer a écrit : > Maybe it would help to have Lintian warn about these things? > > I'm currently working on making Lintian support build profiles so maybe when > I'm done with that I could integrate some ocaml checks which would've avoided > me making the mistakes I initially did: > > - warn if a dependency on ocaml lib is explicitly added even though dh_ocaml > is used > - warn if there is a cma without a cmxs in a runtime package > - warn about any other combination of "X was installed but without Y" in dev > packages
Great. >>> Are you also saying that I do not need to create the two packages >>> libocp-indent-lib-ocaml and libocp-indent-lib-ocaml-dev but that only >>> libocp-indent-lib-ocaml-dev with all the files is enough? From reading [1] >>> it seems that splitting it into a lib and a dev package is only advised if >>> a shared library is involved which is not the case here. >> >> This is indeed what I'm saying. But keep in mind that if someone later >> writes a plugin using libocp-indent-lib-ocaml-dev for a program not >> using it, nor the OCaml toolchain, the second package might be needed. >> >> Whether you create the second package now or later, on demand, is up to >> you :-) > > I see. I will leave them separate for now. I pushed my changes to git. > > I submitted my current patch to Makefile.simple to upstream [1]. One more thing: could you set Maintainer to "Debian OCaml Maintainers" and put your name in Uploaders? Of course, this is just a suggestion ;-) > Thanks a lot for the help :) Thanks a lot for your involvement :) Cheers, -- Stéhane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
