Your message dated Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:22:20 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line SpamOracle - wontfix
has caused the Debian Bug report #341704,
regarding spamoracle: support --help and --version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
341704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341704
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: spamoracle
Version: 1.4-4
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
can you please add support for the command line options --help and
--version or their short forms -V and -h? And if --help is requested,
please do not print the help message to stderr as you do now if a wrong
option is given.
Bye, Jörg.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable/experimental
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages spamoracle depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
spamoracle recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
pgpMiMZ9pgGzD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 171409 + wontfix
tags 341704 + wontfix
stop
Spamoracle no longer actively developed since 2003 (according to its
maintainer). The only change is accepted: corrections security breaches or
corruptions of the database.
On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 11:41:38 +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> De manière générale, SpamOracle n'est plus développé depuis longtemps
> (dernière release en 2003) et tout juste maintenu. S'il y avait un
> gros problème (trou de sécurité, corruption de la base de données),
> les deux autres mainteneurs (*) et moi ferions un correctif et une
> release. Mais ce n'est pas le cas ici.
> Par ailleurs, nous "upstream" n'avons jamais testé SpamOracle avec
> autre chose que procmail. Si ça marche avec qmail ou autre, tant
> mieux pour l'utilisateur, mais "upstream" ne s'engage pas là dessus.
>
> (*) Voir https://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/spamoracle/
--
Stéphane Aulery
--- End Message ---
