On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 23/09/17 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 14/09/17 15:44, Ximin Luo wrote:
> >> Stéphane Glondu:
> >>> On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >>>> [...]
> >>>>> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to
> >>>>> experimental and build fine on all architectures [3].
> >>>>
> >>>>> So, basically, this transition is ready to be started from my point
> of
> >>>>> view.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will take care of the necessary binNMUs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Go ahead.
> >>>
> >>> The transition in Fedora revealed an issue with native dynlink on arm64
> >>> [1]. The issue is being sorted out upstream [2]. Let's wait a bit. If
> >>> this is not fixed in one week, we'll upload ocaml with native dynlink
> >>> disabled on arm64.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6906
> >>> [2] https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1268
> >>>
> >> Upstream fixed this "properly" so I've included that patch and done a
> new upload to experimental. Everything seems OK so far, just waiting for
> slower architectures to build.
> >>
> >> Soon, I will upload to unstable and begin the transition. Let me know
> if you need me to delay it further.
> >
> > That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is
> someone
> > from the ocaml team handling these, or should I?
>
> This took forever, but it finally migrated:
>
> ocaml      | 4.05.0-10     | testing            | source, amd64, arm64,
> armel,
> armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
>
> I had to remove approx and its only rdep openstack-meta-packages, which
> were
> scheduled for autoremoval anyway.
>
> Cheers,
> Emilio
>
> Sorry about this.  I thought I fixed this a few months ago (I definitely
pushed it to git.debian.org), but I guess never uploaded it or missed an
upload error.

I've tried uploading (version 5.10-1) again but haven't gotten a response
yet. Is it going to fail because of the removal, and if so, what should I
try next?

Reply via email to