Your message dated Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:21:51 +0000
with message-id <e1hz1sh-000aoz...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#907636: fixed in opam 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #907636,
regarding opam: "opam init" calls gringo that requires 3GB of memory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
907636: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907636
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: opam
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I ran "opam init" on my little machine that has only 2GB of RAM and
had to kill it after gringo had gobbled all the available memory.
I just tried on a bigger computer to see that it peaks at 3 or 4GB,
making it unusable on small machines.

I wondered why, and how to mitigate this: maybe gringo is not the best
default choice for the chain of dependencies (opam -> aspcud ->
gringo) in opam's case? Is it a bug in opam 2 (I had not noticed a
problem with the previous version), giving a terrible problem to solve
to aspcud?

Best regards,
Samuel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages opam depends on:
ii  aspcud           1:1.9.4-1
ii  build-essential  12.5
ii  curl             7.61.0-1
ii  libbz2-1.0       1.0.6-9
ii  libc6            2.27-5
ii  opam-docs        2.0.0-1
ii  opam-installer   2.0.0-1
ii  packup           0.6-3
ii  unzip            6.0-21
ii  wget             1.19.5-1
ii  zlib1g           1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

Versions of packages opam recommends:
ii  darcs      2.14.0-1
ii  git        1:2.19.0~rc1-1
ii  m4         1.4.18-1
ii  mercurial  4.7-1
ii  ocaml      4.05.0-10+b1
ii  rsync      3.1.2-2.2

opam suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: opam
Source-Version: 2.0.5-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
opam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 907...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nicolas Braud-Santoni <ni...@debian.org> (supplier of updated opam package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:37:02 +0200
Source: opam
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Nicolas Braud-Santoni <ni...@debian.org>
Closes: 907636 908203
Changes:
 opam (2.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 2.0.5
     + Forward-compatibility improvements (OCaml 4.08, Dune 1.7 and later, ...)
     + Numerous bugfixes
     + Patch typos
     + Fixup opam's version number in debian/rules
       Upstream's tarball has the wrong version number set.
 .
   * Build OPAM with its internal solver; add dependency on ocaml-mccs.
   * Remove dependency on external CUDF solvers. (Closes: #908203, #907636)
   * Add basic autopkgtest (opam init && opam install some packages)
     This is sufficient to catch #907636
 .
   * opam: Replace {pre,post}* scripts with a declarative maintscript
   * Switch to debhelper 12, remove the old-style debian/compat.
     This is because dh's compatibility level 12 hard-errors on maintscript 
issues.
     dh 12 is available in stretch-backports, buster, and later.
 .
   * debian/control: Remove unnecessary dependencies
   * Update authorship information (dates, email, ...)
   * Declare compliance with policy 4.4.0
   * Override spurious Lintian warnings
Checksums-Sha1:
 b8c5c65910aec1d9c949fbcb9a3ea367c34b50e8 2509 opam_2.0.5-1.dsc
 f442c6d927791bc22b6f9fa709062383658240b4 619527 opam_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz
 544af909b1851068a2874d93dcb5d66fef9ac447 8352 opam_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 36f215899f22898257baeb46ff835c876886c520 12079 opam_2.0.5-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 191e6762aafdf2ae43cb182c319cde4f4d6cf132bcd579529d100f9eda8e1466 2509 
opam_2.0.5-1.dsc
 9432111732bea1610e284e8ad04489d1a2a9fab81437f5b23bdffdb08afacb82 619527 
opam_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz
 10b564288a22d8dcf9bf0605ecf274692ca73e0cbab827047b26688b993cb6d5 8352 
opam_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 f8d997ccf52b2559c0e716cbaa8acd916988938e4b64f731b3d71507288f2cd0 12079 
opam_2.0.5-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 10a03430abb3792bcca3344101d5fde2 2509 ocaml optional opam_2.0.5-1.dsc
 f86e4330020b6a0e724344ebb04fd73a 619527 ocaml optional opam_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz
 31646f9ae253648f293f723a6794e6a2 8352 ocaml optional opam_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 840804fef7e5bc79098ede44df4cd3a2 12079 ocaml optional 
opam_2.0.5-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEU7EqA8ZVHYoLJhPE5vmO4pLV7MsFAl1YIG8ACgkQ5vmO4pLV
7MsFjA/+KecBPRwEYIkOkfKCTgsFxhOqe7Z8wYr2/1YfR5ldAV1F/zE4VoxGh3mz
C1c5T75qgExpz+CaieoOH5GrVP54STUJLtZjShMHKXAwPhtqvVKn6DC8G80vsTJA
IaMI18bTlIYD+1INtXo8IexpOsvthSjh/3AIBKSsdCn7VlJQCNXUDjqOAgDH9WYR
XcauSwbQQEApF0MTddkRuNKBa7q4q6U0Pi7Utek/kR9sq56565o5m3FE6NLRXszq
cu2ViuADkSSJyvqHIej9/jC46K8yZ9n2/VjX58K+HwUkaoPKXw12MFfhAfjRbXds
AlJS+Q9TBSVWlW3WJhp4Q3/FHoefIvifGsw5bJLQUPrsLBOC7OneOWR00d+ga7tY
VZNtOwVkgWYs9Niy1qad0Ge/SKFNRbeV/S4lDBjA6qPNqsozHasHfDXF18+4h7SY
ooJjpxS5J01r6NCmJn/sRHqMIDTgiCtPxybl/C+mD9pzR8iF5mMaLNMzuW08joNE
Pi6hcUoBsDG1Hr9Fs7RojTF0bDvXLqKQgC7HzyUW4/faugR6EU6nBo3ihB06ux/Y
V3iumeX1NdXNGyQl9c7s0uGg9ziAX2Qj+stkVakASrFsiWS70Bc58ojg9U6Ct/fn
s8vQWl+HLQwk40O10MyLis7R7d2RGB+fBAg6jySBrUo9G/1Vjmw=
=SD5R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to