Hi Ben .. On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:30:12PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: >> >severity 151225 important >> >thanks >> ok ... >> >This is hardly grave. Gcc-3.1 compatibility is not an issue at this >> >point since the default (IOW, tested) compile is gcc-2.95. >> The point is, that working on OpenOffice.org and we have the problem, >> that we build it with two compilers, gcc-3.0 on i386 (it works fine) and >> gcc-2.95 on PPC. >> I want to switch to gcc-3.1 for both supported arches ... >Go with what works for now. No need to switch to a compiler that isn't >supported by the architecture. You will have many more headaches.
We have less headaches with gcc-3.1 on PowerPC. I do not want to switch
over to gcc-3.1 just for fun.
On PowerPC, if we stick with gcc-2.95, we have to use libstlport4.0,
which is not in debian. I think Torsten wont make a libstlport4.0 for
oldlibs, because, that is not nesessary, if we go over to gcc-3.1.
>> >I'll worry about this later when I start moving towards glibc 2.3
>> >snapshots.
>> May I ask, when later is?
>When they start making pre-releases. I'll probably incorporate the ppc
>patches within a few weeks, but the severity really isn't warranted.
I read from Kevin B. Hendriks, OpenOffice.org for PowerPC developer,
that all needed pathes allready applied in CVS for 2.2.5 ...
JFYI
regards
Jan
--
.''`. Jan-Hendrik Palic |
: :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,..
`. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` `
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ' ` `
pgpWMVkaSDZbc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
