severity 427053 important thanks paddor wrote: > Package: openoffice.org-help-km > Version: 2.1~rc2-1
As you maybe have guessed, that is a complete obsolete package. You did see the
version number, didn't you?
$ rmadison openoffice.org-l10n-km
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 | etch-m68k | all
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 | stable | all
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7 | testing | all
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.1~rc2-1 | experimental | all
Not in sid, testings version doesn't have that problem, and the package from
experimental
is cruft.
> I think there is a typo in the category-specification of this package.
> In aptitude, it appears like the folowing:
>
> --------------------------------------
> --\ %CONTRIB%doc
> --\ main - Die Debian-Distribution
> p openoffice.org-help-km ....
> --------------------------------------
Yes. And it's a completely obsolete package it should be removed. See
the bugs on ftp.debian.org for this:
* #421246: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM;
NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Alexander GQ
Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Merged with #421629, #421696, #422138, #425853; 35
days old.
* #421629: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM;
NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Michael Biebl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Merged with #421246, #421696, #422138, #425853; 32
days old.
* #421669: RM: binutils/experimental -- RoM
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: "peter green"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 31 days old.
* #421696: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM;
NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Josh Triplett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Merged with #421246, #421629, #422138, #425853; 31
days old.
* #422138: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM;
NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Vincent
Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Merged with #421246, #421629, #421696, #425853;
29 days old.
* #422562: RM: mysql-admin, mysql-query-browser -- RoM; superseded by
mysql-gui-tools
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Adam Majer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 25 days old.
* #425853: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM;
NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: EmaRsk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Merged with #421246, #421629, #421696, #422138; 8 days old.
Is it *really* so hard to look whether a removal request was already filed for
a completely obsolet package which somehow didn't get removed automatically as
it
should? Easily seeable by the version and the fact that the package is not even
installable.
(simply because it's 2.1)
If the ftpmasters actually would do anything wrt removals I would not get more
of those
useless bugreports.
I think I need to keep this open for openoffice.org-l10n-km to prevent more
bugs like
this (note that this is not fixable anymore by me) filed against
openoffice.org-l10n-km.
*SIGH*
Gr��e/Regards,
Ren�
--
.''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
