On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:50:18PM -0400, Gedalya wrote: > On 10/23/2015 07:45 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > >>I must have been dreaming..... > >Can you expand on what that statement means? Does this mean the steps > >to reproduce do not reliably cause the bug behaviour for you either? > It was a sarcastic response to the maintainer's overall unfriendly > attitude, specifically him directly accusing me of lying.
I read the report just again. Where did I? I wasn't able to reproduce it back then and that always what was I said. The bug that the config dir gets owned by root ttbomk still exhibits if someone calls unopkg as root with $HOME being your home but that shouldn't happen in the package scripts even back then. (That's one reason Debian-packaged extensions are not using unopkg anymore, but install the files directly as "bundled" extension.) + unreproducible is not accusing you of lying, just telling it simply can not be reproduced. Sometimes bugs are hard to reproduce and/or need specific (and be it "weird") steps. I even told you my steps. After whose LO worked. > At the time I was able to reproduce this quite consistently. > However this is an ancient bug report. I have since installed a > Debian desktop with LibreOffice on quite a number of machines and > this issue hasn't been happening. Yep.. Regards, Rene
