Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wrote cvs-buildpackage -- and yet I now use arch, with the as yet > unreleased arch-buildpackage. I would strongly advocate using arch
Hard to beat that as a recommendation. ;) It sounds as though alioth may not have the necessary facilities, which is unfortunate. > (I personally found arch-buildpackage less limiting than > tla_buildpackage, since there was no limitation on the number and > naming of the branches used in packaging -- but that restriction may > have been removed from tla_buildpackage) <joke>Well, tla-buildpackage is written in python, so of course There's Only One Way To Do It!</joke> Jokes aside (sorry, John, I really do like it!), I, personally, have yet to need more freedom than it provides, and it's limitations have helped insulate me from some things about arch that I am not yet at home with. That said, whenever you decide you want someone external to poke at arch-buildpackage, I'd be interested in doing so. Mike -- Me, Slinky Redfoot and our trusty angel girls -- Steely Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
