But Patricia.pm is arch-independent, right? I agree that Patricia.so is arch-dependent... Isn't it the case of putting .bs and .so in usr/lib and .pm in usr/share?
Em Seg, 2004-01-26 �s 12:24, Colin Watson escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:04:18AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > lintian almost ok: > > W: libnet-patricia-perl: > > package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5 > > usr/lib/perl5/Net/Patricia.pm > > > > <QUOTE > > FROM="http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpackage-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5.html";> > > Architecture-independent Perl code should be placed in /usr/share/perl5, > > not /usr/lib/perl5. > > </QUOTE> > > lintian's wrong; Patricia.pm is a thin wrapper around Patricia.so (from > XS), which *is* architecture-dependent. Brendan O'Dea explained this > some time ago on this list, but the lintian maintainer has refused to > change it even though having files in /usr/lib rather than /usr/share is > safe while having files in /usr/share rather than /usr/lib can break > things. > > Cheers, > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
