Ron dijo [Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:19:31AM +1030]: > Yes, I spoke to them when they were first announced, but I believe they > have (had?) enough of their own work to do for a while. I'm happy to keep > the package to keep it from being orphaned, because as you say it is > quite trivial, and seldom has bugs other than 'new upstream'. > > I made the offer about co-maintainer because IIRC you've shown an > interest in it before and that would let you close bugs and the like > without having to have it dropped in your lap as your primary > responsibility. > > If you're not sure what I mean by co-maintainer, see, er, the developers > reference I think. It's now a recognised role.
If you want, I will gladly be a co-maintainer. As you say, this seems like quite an easy package. I don't use it, though, and am unlikely to help much in improving it (besides closing any bugs that might appear). Now, at least I will close those four bugs you have as 'fixed' :) I will upload a new package version adding myself as a comaintainer then. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
