Joachim Breitner dijo [Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:24:26PM +0200]: > > As I said previously (probably via private e-mail) to Allard, I > > strongly think that if we are to adopt either CVS or SVN, we should do > > it atomically - leave CVS altogether and just start using > > SVN. Otherwise we will end up with two completely unsynchronized > > repositories - not something we want, right? :) > > I agree, and now officially state not preference for either system :-) > > (Though it would be nice if svn would be able to run the update-website > script upon each commit to the website directory)
I would prefer moving to SVN, it is designed as an improvement over CVS, and has many features allowing for an easier, more fine-grained control (specially, repository-wide atomic version tagging). Now... I'll be modifying libvorbis-perl right now, and I could not use the SVN server following Allard's instructions (am I too dumb?), so I will commit to CVS. Allard, what I did was: svn checkout svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-perl/libvorbis-perl/trunk svn checkout svn://svn.alioth.debian.org/pkg-perl/libvorbis-perl/trunk svn checkout svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/pkg-perl/libvorbis-perl/trunk svn checkout svn+ssh://svn.alioth.debian.org/pkg-perl/libvorbis-perl/trunk Each of them gave me the same message: svn: No repository found in 'svn+ssh://svn.alioth.debian.org/pkg-perl/libvorbis-perl/trunk' So... Well, please direct me ;-) Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
