> Not only his opinion. You started with an upper-case "LIE" in the still 'an opinion'. Mistaken at that. > subject, which is good sign for yet another idiot with some weird idea. Are you trying to insult me? or who? Where exactly can I find technical part of debian-perl?
> see if it is real problem. If you're right, we can try to fix it, but What about XML::Mini? RPC::XML? Crypt::CBC? in other words: librpc-xml-perl,libnet-easytcp-perl,libio-multiplex-perl, libnet-server-perl,libio-socket-ssl-perl,libcompress-zlib-perl,libcrypt-cbc-perl, libxml-mini-perl... So once again, is there some legitimate reason for adding dependancy on 5.8 on packages that don't really need 5.8? -- Dariush Pietrzak, Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
