Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I should have said would like to ... :-) I didn't know that you were > reading this list too. There's no need then to send you debian-perl > weekly news. :-)
I much appreciated that summary, because it was much more in touch with this list than I am in general. > In fact in doesn't check the perl version but do some checks in order to > determine the perl package (perl5, perl-5.004, perl-5.005, perl-5.005-thread > and so on) that will be listed in the Depends field of the package beeing > built. Maybe I should find a better name ... what about dh_perldeps ? Oh, I see. Does it use the normal substvars mechanism for that? > PS: At the beginning I wanted a generic name because I may add things like > automatic removal of .packlist file to this script. dh_perl might make more sense. I'll take another look at the script -- send it to me inb a wishlist bug report. -- see shy jo
