> This suggests that we either need a package that includes it---and I > would argue with Manoj that that would have to be libcgi-perl, since > there are already packages out there that (I suspect) mistakenly have > dependencies on it---or our heroic perl maintainers need to take the > tiger by the tail and update the perl sources with the new version.
I think the best solution is to split CGI.pm from main perl package. If not, maybe "fake" package would help? Off topic: Well, I think the perl policy should tell about package names. I though libcgi-perl contains CGI.pm but it didn't. -- Piotr "Dexter" Roszatycki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
