Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't see why. As bod said: > > Note that /usr/lib/perl5 should not really be included, although will be > > required transitionally for backward compatibility with current modules.
Sorry, you're right---I noticed the coment but thought it was referring to the /usr/lib/perl5/5.6 in the -V output. I didn't notice the bare /usr/lib/perl5/. That sounds fine then. > The real catch to watch out for is that any modules that use > /usr/share/perl will need to depend on perl 5.6, wince they will > fail to work with older perl packages. <deadpan>But dh_perl will take care of that.</deadpan> Mike.
