Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:47:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222553: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2002 23:22:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 16 17:22:33 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18DCGn-0001LT-00; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:22:33 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18DCHa-0003Af-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:23:22 +0100
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:23:22 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: handling of additional documentation with doc-base
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Surprisingly enough, we have yet to put any mention of doc-base into the
Policy. A lot of the packages that need it use it by now[1], so it appears
to be working properly. It would be useful if it was "legalized" by the
Policy Manual so that new maintainers can't miss it for example, and that
existing maintainers can't ignore it saying "it's not in Policy, so what if
it's a good idea!".
So, I propose an addition like this into the section
13.3 "Additional documentation":
All additional documentation should be registered via doc-base so that
is made available in generic documentation viewers (such as dhelp, dwww
or doc-central). Please refer to the doc-base manual in the doc-base
package for all the information on the exact technical implementation.
That makes not having doc-base files a normal or minor bug, which seems
reasonable to me.
(Linking within the paragraph is left as an exercise to the policy editor,
e.g., myself. :)
[1] For reference, on my machine:
% dpkg -S /usr/share/doc-base/* | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | wc -l
58
% dpkg -l | grep ^.i -c
688
Considerable percentage, even...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 222553-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 03:52:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 20:52:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dj7tz-0003Vi-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:52:19 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dj7os-0000P7-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:47:02 -0400
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#222553: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:47:02 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: debian-policy
Source-Version: 3.6.2.0
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
debian-policy_3.6.2.0.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.6.2.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.0.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.6.2.0_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.0_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated debian-policy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:27:17 -0500
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.6.2.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Policy List <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
debian-policy - Debian Policy Manual and related documents
Closes: 89867 146023 203145 216104 222553 239359 260092 270020 273122 276953
284967 286549 286553 290270 291026 295939 308886 309162
Changes:
debian-policy (3.6.2.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
Manoj:
* Bug fix: "policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register
docs", thanks to Joey Hess (Closes: #222553).
* Bug fix: "[PROPOSAL] Document Uploaders: field in policy", thanks to
Andrew Pollock. Andreas Metzler provided the wording, though it was
modified during inclusion. (Closes: #203145).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: Minor grammatical correction in section 9.4",
thanks to Eric Evans. I rejected the proposed change, instead I went
over the whole policy document and removed all he/she/him/her
constructs before the gender police jump all over me. (Closes: #273122).
* Bug fix: "XSI:ism in prerm and postinst", thanks to David Weinehall
(Closes: #260092).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: please clarify section 12.7.", thanks to
Adrian Bunk. Added a clarifying footnote that makes it clear that
section 12.3 does not allow one to ignore section 12.7 (Closes: #276953).
*
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: should not ship generated files in source
archive, and should clean them from the tree", thanks to Branden
Robinson (Closes: #284967).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: Detailed description of maintainer script
calls (Section 6.5) is incomplete", thanks to Nikolaus Schulz
and Thomas Hood. What happens when error unwinding itself runs into
problems is perhaps not discussed as completely as it should be.
(Closes: #286549).
* Bug fix: "9.3.3.2 "command -v" example needs tweaking",
thanks to Thomas Hood. Instead of the massively complex shenanigans
suggested in the bug report, just use which. which lives in an
essential package, so can be used in the preinst of packages.
(Closes: #291026).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: please clarify/loosen the policy on rewriting
history", thanks to Frank Küster. Since this was not really a
directive, but merely an expression of an opinion, moved it into an
informative footnote. (Closes: #290270).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: virtual package request: mpd-client", thanks
to Eric Wong (Closes: #270020).
* Bug fix: "[ACCEPTED 2005/02/04]: "libexec", or use of "lib" for
binaries in lib* packages", thanks to Junichi Uekawa
(Closes:
#146023).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: virtual package: flexmem", thanks to Bartosz
Fenski aka fEnIo (Closes:
#239359).
* Bug fix: "Please clarify Section 2.5. required <-> essential",
thanks to Adrian Bunk. Clarified the section. (Closes:
#216104).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: Please remove virtual package
aspell-dictionary", thanks to Brian Nelson (Closes:
#295939).
* Bug fix: "[AMENDMENT 18/02/2002] Where to place web-accessible
images", thanks to Tollef Fog Heen (Closes:
#89867).
* Bug fix: "debian-policy: erroneous enumeration in prebuilt policy.*
files", thanks to Nikolaus Schulz. I am hoping that this shall go away
when we rebuild. (Closes:
#286553).
* Bug fix: "please make names of alternate versions links", thanks to
Robert Cheramy. Added HTTPPATH elements that should provide the URL's
as well as the hyperlinks. (Closes:
#308886).
* Bug fix: "www.debian.org: Misspelling in Policy Manual", thanks to
Roberto C. Sanchez Various spelling errors were also corrected in a
spell check run. (Closes:
#309162).
Files:
cf0be01cba3bdb456d0e70dadf29eb93 821 doc optional debian-policy_3.6.2.0.dsc
79c7805c9bf8f85f09bdb4937e8fbfc1 1137058 doc optional
debian-policy_3.6.2.0.tar.gz
eaf30c1971f0e315828a0651eeafa697 1620370 doc optional
debian-policy_3.6.2.0_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCskNVIbrau78kQkwRAnocAKDRoeUJPw+S6duGVZrDKn4fiq1/8wCgvIkq
0RG+xdTvvqZRHIJ2UB+5d2U=
=c6IY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
