joost witteveen wrote: > > Nfsroot isn't at all for ordinary users, it's only for admins. So, > I don't mind if ordinary (non-tar-aware) users cannot read the > example files from nfsroot: they'll have to become "unix-aware" first > anyway.
I understand, but maybe if we could make it "simpler" even for admins... > And yes, I realise you were talking about real documentation in > /usr/doc/*/*.tar.gz. Now, that's something different, and maybe > the maintainers should think again about those tarfiles. But > on the bases of those "doc.tar.gz" files you wanted policy to be > changed to the effect of not allowing .tar.gz in /usr/doc. That I > think is wrong. yes, I'm talking about documentation in tar.gz. On the bases of those "doc.tar.gz" files I want policy to be changed to the effect of not allowing documentation files in .tar.gz ---------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ does this sound better? Note that I would like to have "example" files (not only docs, but also code example and config examples) referenced inside html docs as links to the file, not to the tarball. fabrizio -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic | 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
