On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andreas Jellinghaus:
> > please split hamm into two distributions :
> > hamm/unstable and hamm-unstable/fhs-unstable (maybe you have better names).
>
> I'm afraid I think this is a stunningly bad idea.
Exactly.
With the introduction of FHS, we'll increment the policy version to
2.4.x.x or 3.x.x.x. With that, you just have to check the
Standards-Version field of a package to know if it is FHS or FSSTND
compliant.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian is looking [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for a logo! Have a
look at our drafts PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
at http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-logo/
