Hi,
>>"Johnie" == Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Johnie> "Andreas" == Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Changes: section. So Guys script should look for #(\d+) and close
>> $1 after proceeding (speaking in Perl).
Andreas> lets use "\(close #(\d+)\)", some people might make a note
Andreas> related to a bug not yet fixed.
Johnie> I prefer the current usage of #(\d+) -- a bug that is
Johnie> referenced but not to be closed can bet called just \d+, or
Johnie> Bug \d+, and the script will ignore it just as "release"
Johnie> currently does.
But this is far less intuitive than the explicit close: and
one word should not be too onerous.
manoj
--
When a man is a lie-abed and over-eats, a lazy person who wallows in
sleep like a great over-fed hog, a fool like that will be reborn time
after time. 325
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
