On Sat, Dec 20 1997 16:17 +1100 Hamish Moffatt writes: > On Fri, Dec 19, 1997 at 01:31:38PM -0500, Scott Ellis wrote: > > And the instant someone provides us with free software equivilant to ssh > > or pgp, we'll move to use it. We need the functionality, unfortunatly > > sometimes you have to use what you can get. > > Hmmm. Perhaps this is a flaw in the non-US section, > or at least the perception of it (or mine at very least). I had > assumed that non-US meant otherwise free, which having just > read the copyrights for ssh and pgp, I see is not the case .. Isn't the hamm non-us section split into non-free and hamm ? I thought, this was the consensus, since non-us only means `not to be (re-)exported from the US'.
David
