[Sorry to be offtopic a bit] "Remco" == Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also think the > link /bin/sh could be perfectly managed by the `alternatives' > system, with the `smallest' shell (in terms of memory and processor > requirements) having the highest priority.
How about "most standard", i.e., most in accordance w/ POSIX? ;) Anyone have any information about the POSIXability of different shells, their indices of POSIXal correctness? Of course, bash behaves different when invoked as /bin/sh compared to /bin/bash. .....A. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
