-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I agree that the proposed text is better than nothing, but it is still too weak.
Even if we keep upstream source numbers untouched, it would be a good thing to encourage upstream authors to use YYYY-MM-DD because it is an ISO standard for dates. Therefore we should consider "foo version number is not yyyy-mm-dd" as a legitimate bug (wishlist type, if we want), that should be forwarded upstream as a suggestion to upstream authors. Moreover, I think we should use the standard for *all* our own packages. Thanks. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNL0dxyqK7IlOjMLFAQE/iwP/ceoQN2V+ndHmws0cA/rB4Uxq6mMg1xui zfdRmlqE04dgUDJz+35nrohnGtnyP0Z0fSbKn1skg/RgBIGhQ8LOqgi0/J6bP/qd I6rKFMN3vRSMhHdwa8sD1CtXfc3TaC1usP3EaQSOpOlnAYcsmTw1aPChFUjIMRQs xbX3G5Hmy4o= =Qeus -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
