On Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 12:09:10AM +0100, Christian Schwarz wrote: > On 30 Jan 1998, James Troup wrote: > > > Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > As long as the binary packages `Depend:' (or `Recommend:') the > > > package containing /usr/doc/source-package and they install a > > > symlink /usr/doc/binary-package this solution is fine with me. > > > > IMHO this will lead to spurious Depends: being added to packages > > simply to satisfy 5.6. > > You are absolutely right.
Sure. The symlink of the doc directory should never be the reason for a Depends: line; but when a depends to the same version already exists (as in -dev and -dbg packages, as policy) the symlink may be allowed. Maybe we can enforce this point in the policy, just for clarity. > The initial idea (I think it came from Guy) was to either extract > /usr/doc/foo/copyright (if it exists) and save it in a file "foo", or if > /usr/doc/foo -> bar extract a symlink "foo -> bar". So this would be easy > to implement, I guess. > idea: Apart the debian pristine packages (which IMO should always be DFSG compliant), all the other packages have their "copyright" files fully included in the .diff Maybe the checker could simply extract them from the .diff, when checking for DFSG compliance (the original reason for automatic extraction). When more than one copyright file exixts, as in case of multiple binary packages, we should force the use of samething like naminig debian/copyright.<binary> to permit easy extraction from the .diff This seems better than forcing duplication of files in the HD just because of the extraction for checking them. > After the discussion of the previous days, I'm pretty sure that the > current policy WRT copyright files is well thought and the only good way > to handle it. So it's just a matter of getting some packages fixed--that > shouldn't be a big problem. Agree. Maybe simply add more example/explanation in the policy, just to avoid discussions on the interpretation :-) Fabrizio -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Líder Minimo del Pluto - Debian Developer & Happy Debian User | 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E > more than 34 months are needed to get rid of the millennium. [me]
