On 13 Mar 1998, Rob Browning wrote: > > Is there some good reason? I guess it depends on the interpretation > of "postrm". > > It seemed to me like it might make sense to remove them in the postrm > where you know that anything that might have referenced this directory > is gone, and can't be executed again. > > Just curious. I don't think it'll affect me one way or the other. I > did have the emacsen-common package doing some final cleanup in the > postrm (removing files that had been created in the preinst). I > suppose given this policy, I should probably change that too...
Just curious. What are you doing in /usr/local? I thought no package should touch /usr/local. Remco -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
