If I may ask, what package gave the warnings?? Many of us do not have csh installed, so any package wanting it would have me either install csh or skip the package. A package that uses csh or would aid csh would make sense to use csh in its install. Also be aware that like the original lint, lintian warnings are just that --> they can be ignored. Your package will not explode or be removed from the distribution. I recall reading that it is HIGHLY recommened in debian-policy to not use csh. So yes lintian is following the "rules" here. This is not a "we hate csh" stance. Rather it has to do with the shells free-ness. And as Manoj said, many UN*X people do personally feel that csh has problems. But I believe Debian's main problem with csh is its license.
----------------------------------------------- How can you see, when your mind is not open? How can you feel, when your eyes are closed? - Jason Bonham Band, "Ordinary Black and White" ----------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
