-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I wrote:
> tell me example of required package whose removal "can leave your system > totally FUBAR" but it is not essential. I will submit a bug immediately > if there is such package. Well, James Troup has kindly e-mailed me in private to tell me that my last sentence may be easily misunderstood and could be considered as a "bug terrorism" case (strange, because that would mean there would be a lot of such packages, which I consider unlikely). Anyway, I will rewrite the paragraph completely: If there were a required package whose removal "can leave your system totally FUBAR", then it would be certainly a candidate for becoming an essential package (in addition to being required). Is this ok now, James? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNRbfSCqK7IlOjMLFAQGnpQQAiHNoJKOZHvZDhbe9HPZwR4QeaGdurbd3 BQ8xPLTR+Vo2FDy1xq+xzRUQohp5ebuhl3wDfbs+9afH2wPzOZshr+nXvjRDpJ0w dafYuwRnMRxr/0mPoPWuRG4afAvhJjqQNy2FTi+nGwdjmXYFZmgQ8AKlBYoDN8Td iCqSLkeGnBY= =CmPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
