Santiago Vila Doncel wrote: > Ok, ok, please no flames. I simply did not remember that discussion. No flames intended, I like the fact that there are people out there checking packages.
> Definitely we need a list of essential and required packages explaining > why they are essential and why they are not. It seems that the policy on how to determine if a package is Essential may need some work, otherwise we would of all been able to say "of course it is (not)". - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 |@work: [EMAIL PROTECTED], @play: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| |@home: [EMAIL PROTECTED], @debian:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |@web: http://www.triode.net.au/~csmall @spam:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
